Longer might not be better with regards to chemo for cancer of the breast.
For ladies who went through chemo after surgery and chemotherapy for cancer of the breast, a radiation regimen composed of 15 treatment sessions over 3 days made an appearance to become competitive with another regimen of 25 sessions over 5 days following a 10-year follow-up period, based on findings from the large trial released yesterday in The Lancet Oncology. This conclusion took it’s origin from the ten-year follow-up outcomes of the United kingdom Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) trials, 2 randomized controlled trials investigating the perfect regimen of adjuvant radiotherapy for cancer of the breast.
Within the Uk plus Canada, the three-week regimen has reigned supreme practice in cancer of the breast strategy to decades. Within the U . s . States, however, the lengthy-time standard practice continues to be the more 5-week regimen, and until lately no official guidelines around the shorter regimen existed.
The Two trials (START-A and begin-B) started within the Uk in 1998 and randomized greater than 4000 women to get various radiotherapy regimens. START-B checked out longer versus shorter durations of treatment. It compared a radiation regimen of fifty Gy (grey, a standardized measurement of radiation dose) split into 25 treatment sessions or “fractions” (2 Gy per fraction) over 5 days by having an alternate regimen of 40 Gy split into 15 fractions (2.67 Gy per fraction) over 3 days. The main finish points from the START trials were local-regional relapse, understood to be cancer recurrence within the breast, chest wall, or lymph nodes on a single side from the body, and native radiation-caused toxicity or “tissue effects,” as assessed by clinician examination photos.
In 2008, 5-year outcomes of the beginning trials were printed and demonstrated the 2 regimens were equally effective which the three-week regimen had less adverse tissue effects. Another randomized (although smaller sized) Canadian trial printed similar leads to 2010. These results solidified practice guidelines within the Uk and Canada.
Within the U . s . States, the American Society of Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) released new practice guidelines this year to condition the 3-week regimen might be suitable for a particular subset of patients with early cancer of the breast. However, this recommendation wasn’t strong and therefore continues to be loosely adopted into clinical practice. The rules put greater focus on the traditional 5-week regimen, which remains broadly utilized in practice. Based on the guidelines, a significant rationale for ongoing to recommend the five-week regimen was concern the greater per-fraction radiation dose within the 3-week regimen (2.67 versus 2 Gy per fraction) might have potential “late” radiation toxicity effects that appear once 10 years, for example late tissue effects, cardiovascular occasions, and lung toxicity.
The needed-released 10-year START trial results might help address these concerns. The brand new data basically read the 5-year results: the three-week 40-Gy regimen only agreed to be competitive with the five-week 50-Gy regimen regarding local-regional relapse, and in addition it had less negative effects, even though the studies centered on local tissue effects and never cardiovascular or lung effects. Nevertheless, these results claim that the three-week 40-Gy regimen was less dangerous to normalcy tissue and never less efficient for cancerous tissue.
There also was an unpredicted survival benefit within the group that went through the three-week regimen. Quite simply, it’s entirely possible that the three-week regimen very can be not only equal to, but really somewhat much better than, the five-week regimen. However, because survival would be a secondary (and never primary) outcome during these studies, this result must be investigated further.
Because of the immense cost and convenience advantages of a shorter radiotherapy course in cancer of the breast, this huge follow-up study may have the possibility to help future US clinical practice patterns. However, it might not be enough to spur immediate change: an american phase 3 medical trial investigating exactly the same concern is presently recruiting patients, by having an believed completion date of 2020 for final data on primary outcome measures.
Resourse: https://newsatjama.jama.com/2013/09/20/study-confirms-shorter-course-of-radiation-for-breast-cancer-is-safe-and-effective-after-10-years/
160th Knowledge Seekers Workshop February 23rd, 2017
Video COMMENTS:
86daily: Mr. Keshe I have a question. It pains me very much to say what I am about to say. \nMany times students call you for specifics as to how things are done and your common response to all of them is everything is correct. and see what the out come will be. The beauty of this technology is that it has a great deal of possibilities. Now you wonder why people teach all kinds of ways and have no consistency how they do things. You play the magician of hocos pocos and voila and never disclose how it really works. \nYou have being teach in generalities for three years and expect us to invent solutions ourselves. I get that you want to keep the most important thing to yourself. Now the governments are wanting you to quantify everything, nail it down, for replication. Then you insult your students because they are teaching it wrong, they are doing it wrong, they are leaving out little details that makes the nano coating directionless and therefore the plasma energy is scattered. If you can't teach in such a way to clarify these anomalies then can we go to somewhere where we can get the truth. Because looking back into 160 five hour videos to find facts, details scattered is like looking for a needle in a hay stack. All our memories are messed up by what the gov't are doing to us via HAARP and other electromagnetic frequencies. Even our house power meters and cell phone towers are messing with our brains.\nA wise man once told me "KEEP IT SIMPLE , KEEP IT STUPID". \nMay be monkey see, monkey do is not so bad because that's what the Ghanain gov't and Scientist are asking you to do. NO?\nLots of Love
Shawn Snudden: Good words.
HICKERL: Until nobody remove his main fuses and get autark. Even supid or?
HICKERL: 1:41:30–1:42:30 \nOnly for Guru is allowed to have income with this technology. A blind one curses the other blind that he see bad. To this day nothing works. Even stupid or?\n\nNur der Guru darf daran verdienen. Ein Blinder schimpft den anderen Blinden dass er schlecht sieht. Bis heute funktioniert nichts. Schon blöd oder?
HICKERL: 1:41:30–1:42:30 \nNur der Guru darf daran verdienen. Ein Blinder schimpft den anderen Blinden dass er schlecht sieht. Bis heute funktioniert nichts. Schon blöd oder?\n\nOnly for Guru is allowed to have income with this technology. A blind one curses the other blind that he see bad. To this day nothing works. Even stupid or?
Ron Kanna: I agree, this dancing around the processes and solutions is annoying! If it is to move forward and progress rapidly then specific details about the basic processes need to be standardized so that everyone is on the same page for research and development!
mag netron: United States government already has free energy only for military use. they want Keshe to quantify his principle so that they can counter it. for Keshe tovreveal principle to U.S. government is suicidal.
mag netron: that being said we must do our best to understand free energy and do it ourselves if u take no action free energy will never be achieved.
mag netron: Keshe needs to drop the free energy card now government will never agree to peace, and therefore Keshe is wasting time waiting for government to trade free energy for peace.
kekec Terminator: Why the bigest countries spent so much on ˇobsoleteˇ wepons technology if this Mr. Kesh technology is real?
kekec Terminator: If the fondation is cooperating with western countries and institutions show us where the articles in the scientific publications were published about GANS and Keshe technology. Where the articles about this research was published?
Trixie Spark: Chemistry has under 200 elements of which everything is made of. How hard can it be. Less than 200. Easily calculated by atomic weight in space. an algorithm can easily be developed
James Triplett: bees wax with pine resin @3:10
Trixie Spark: Think of these reactions as arcs of electricity. But I suspect is fueled not by hydrogen, but by Sodium. A new arc(s) are needed to repel the sun and remove the hydro carbons. You cannot win against nature, the soul of the planet, knows all through the memory of water and the sodium to spark its truth. Just as the suns(sons) hydrogen excites and transfers information. I have many theories, but no answers.
Dyanne Gavin: Very exciting, I am sorry I am not able to donate right now because I am disabled because of extremely severe pain in my back. I went to college for 7 1/2 years to teach literacy in United States however my disability company that I paid into the whole time teaching was exposed to be fraudulent on 20/20, not paying any claims lasting more then a year. They have 50,000 cases against them and are still No.1 in the U. S. (Unim Provident). I NEED YOUR PAIN PEN AND THEN I COULD MAKE MONEY AGAIN AND THEN I COULD DONATE. PLEASE< PLEASE HELP….Dyanne
